#PHOTODIRECTOR VS PHOTOSHOP SOFTWARE#
#PHOTODIRECTOR VS PHOTOSHOP PROFESSIONAL#
#PHOTODIRECTOR VS PHOTOSHOP SERIES#
#PHOTODIRECTOR VS PHOTOSHOP MAC#

I guess for most casual users who just want to edit a few vacation photos, it wouldn’t pose a problem, but it will be a bit limiting for anyone who regularly takes a lot of photos. I can’t really see the logic behind the ‘projects’ organizational concept, but perhaps I’m just too used to working with programs that allow me to maintain a single catalog of all my images. You can also tag files with specific keywords to enable quick searches across large projects, if you have the time and patience to do so. Within each project the organizational tools are good, allowing for the standard range of star ratings, pick or reject flags, and color coding. But if you want to manage your entire photo library, you’ll need to maintain a project file for that specific purpose, because any tagging or sorting done in one project isn’t accessible from another project. All your library information is managed within ‘projects’, which function as catalogs but operate independently from each other.įor example, you might have one project for your vacation photos, another for your best friend’s wedding, and so on. PhotoDirector’s library management tools are a strange blend of excellent and needlessly confusing. They’re already clearly separated, so I found that the blue accents were more of a distraction than a help, although it’s a minor issue. There are some odd choices in the UI design, notably the unnecessary blue highlighting that separates the various elements of the workspace. It also makes it fairly easy to export a file at any stage, whether you want to save it to your computer or upload it to social media. The filmstrip navigation at the bottom is visible throughout all modules along with the associated tagging and rating tools, which makes it easy to keep your images organized throughout the editing process.

#PHOTODIRECTOR VS PHOTOSHOP SERIES#

It’s broken down into a series of modules that are more or less standard for RAW photo editors today, with a couple of extras thrown in: Library, Adjustment, Edit, Layers, Create, and Print. User Interfaceįor the most part, the PhotoDirector user interface is clean and uncluttered.

#PHOTODIRECTOR VS PHOTOSHOP MAC#

The Mac version should look similar with only a few small interface variations. Cyberlink PhotoDirector is available for both Windows and Mac, but the screenshots below are from the Windows version. Instead, we’ll look at more general things like the user interface, how it handles your photos, and how capable it is as an editor. Note: PhotoDirector has a range of unique features that provide some interesting options for casual users, but we don’t have room in this review to explore each and every one. Detailed Review of CyberLink PhotoDirector I’m always interested in experimenting with new editing programs, and I bring all of that experience to these reviews to help you decide what’s worth your time.ĭisclaimer: Cyberlink provided me with no compensation or consideration for the writing of this PhotoDirector review, and they have had no editorial control or review of the content before publishing.

#PHOTODIRECTOR VS PHOTOSHOP SOFTWARE#

I first started working with digital imagery in the early 2000s, and since then I’ve worked with everything from open-source editors to industry-standard software suites.

#PHOTODIRECTOR VS PHOTOSHOP PROFESSIONAL#

Hi, my name is Thomas Boldt, and I’ve worked with a wide range of image editing programs over the course of my work as a graphic designer and professional photographer. Why Trust Me for This PhotoDirector Review?

Reasons Behind My PhotoDirector Ratings.

Detailed Review of CyberLink PhotoDirector.

Why Trust Me for This PhotoDirector Review?.

Photodirector vs photoshop